AICPA Supports Repeal of Burdensome Tax Information Reporting Measure

AICPA Supports Repeal of Burdensome Tax Information Reporting Measure
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants told members of Congress recently they should repeal the section of the new health care law that requires businesses to report to the Internal Revenue Service any purchase from a vendor of goods or services worth $600 or more during the calendar year.

The AICPA said it will be burdensome and costly for small businesses to compile the data and prepare the Form 1099-MISC information return. Furthermore, the AICPA said the information collected on the 1099 forms will not be very helpful to the IRS in collecting any unpaid taxes that should have been paid by the vendor because it will be difficult to reconcile payments reported on the forms and income reported by the vendor.

The reporting requirement is included in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and is effective for purchases made in 2012 that will be reported on 1099 forms filed in 2013.

A copy of the AICPA’s letter to members of the U.S. Senate is pasted below. An identical letter was sent to members of the U.S. House of Representatives.

If you would like to speak to someone about the AICPA’s letter, please contact Shirley Twillman, AICPA senior manager for media relations, at 202-434-9220 or stwillman@aicpa.org.

To read the entire article and a copy of the letter, please click the link above.

Repost from CNN/Money.com: IRS starts mopping up Congress's tax-reporting mess

IRS starts mopping up Congress's tax-reporting mess
By Neil deMause, contributing writerJuly 9, 2010: 11:18 AM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- With a new mandate looming that will require business owners to file millions more tax forms, the Internal Revenue Service has begun the daunting process of figuring out how to turn the law's sweeping demands into actual rules for taxpayers.

To read the rest of the article click here. IRS starts mopping up Congress's tax-reporting mess

Costly IRS Mandate Slipped into Health Bill

A recent post by Chris Edwards on the Cato Institute Blog, Costly IRS Mandate Slipped into Health Bill, reviews a mandate included in the recent health care bill that increases reporting requirements for businesses.

A few wording changes to the tax code’s section 6041 regarding 1099 reporting were slipped into the 2000-page health legislation. The changes will force millions of businesses to issue hundreds of millions, perhaps billions, of additional IRS Form 1099s every year.

The current law requires businesses to issue 1099's to contractors, however the new law purchases to the requirements. As described by RIA, a firm that provides tax information, and quoted by Edwards,

The 2010 Health Care Act adds “amounts in consideration for property” (Code Sec. 6041(a) as amended by 2010 Health Care Act §9006(b)(1)) and “gross proceeds” (Code Sec. 6041(a) as amended by 2010 Health Care Act §9006(b)(2)) to the pre-2010 Health Care Act categories of payments for which an information return to IRS will be required if the $600 aggregate payment threshold is met in a tax year for any one payee. Thus, Congress says that for payments made after 2011, the term “payments” includes gross proceeds paid in consideration for property or services.

Edwards quotes Chris Hesse of LeMaster Daniels PLLC as saying, "Under the new law, businesses will be required to send a 1099 to other businesses for virtually all purchases."

The requirements are already being challenged. Representative Dan Lungren (R-Calif.) introduced legislation repealing the requirement. As reported by the On the Money, the Hill's blog on finance and the economy, Lungren thinks that the burden is not particularly wise.

"It is just one of the dumber things I have seen in Congress," he said, adding, "Imagine this: Goods and services purchased by a small business, from a supplier ranging from component parts of every American product, to phone and internet service, to the shipping service of Fed Ex or UPS, will now give rise to a new paperwork burden at tax time."

The proposal is apparently now waiting for the Ways and Means Committee.

Do you have too many bank or investment accounts?

I’ve prepared many returns over the last few years, and I’ve been surprised at the number of 1099 forms that clients bring in with their files. Multiple checking and savings accounts and investment accounts are easy to accumulate. People often open new accounts when they apply for auto loans and mortgages or home equity loans. Some people like the idea of banking with a large bank, but they still like to have accounts in local banks or credit unions. Sometimes people change banks to chase rates and don’t close old accounts.

Why is it a problem to have a lot of accounts? It may not be a problem. It makes sense to have separate accounts for personal and business items. It also makes sense to have accounts for special purposes. It becomes a problem when there are too many accounts and there is not a good reason to have them. Here’s why.

Confusion: It is difficult to keep track of many accounts

Cost: Financial institutions often have balance requirements that determine fees. Spreading assets around may mean that individual account balances are too small to qualify for fee waivers. Investment and brokerage accounts, for example, a typically base commission charges on account balances.

Reduced returns: Many financial institutions use account balances to help determine the rates of return they will pay on account balances.

Complications: Having more accounts than necessary adds to the complexity of financial transactions. This leads to increased bookkeeping fees and tax preparation costs.

Take a look at your statements. Does it look like you have too many accounts?